This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Don't handle CAST_RESTRICT (PR tree-optimization/49279)


[ quote-pasted from https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg00464.html ]

CAST_RESTRICT based disambiguation unfortunately isn't reliable,
e.g. to store a non-restrict pointer into a restricted field,
we add a non-useless cast to restricted pointer in the gimplifier,
and while we don't consider that field to have a special restrict tag
because it is unsafe to do so, we unfortunately create it for the
CAST_RESTRICT before that and end up with different restrict tags
for the same thing.  See the PR for more details.

This patch turns off CAST_RESTRICT handling for now, in the future
we might try to replace it by explicit CAST_RESTRICT stmts in some form,
but need to solve problems with multiple inlined copies of the same function
with restrict arguments or restrict variables in it and intermixed code from
them (or similarly code from different non-overlapping source blocks).

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
4.6 too?

2011-10-06  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR tree-optimization/49279
	* tree-ssa-structalias.c (find_func_aliases): Don't handle
	CAST_RESTRICT.
	* tree-ssa-forwprop.c (forward_propagate_addr_expr_1): Allow
	restrict propagation.
	* tree-ssa.c (useless_type_conversion_p): Don't return false
	if TYPE_RESTRICT differs.

	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/restrict-4.c: XFAIL.
	* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr49279.c: New test.

Hi,

In the patch adding support for CAST_RESTRICT ( https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg00176.html ) there was also a bit:
...
	* fold-const.c (fold_unary_loc): Don't optimize
	POINTER_PLUS_EXPR casted to TYPE_RESTRICT pointer by
	casting the inner pointer if it isn't TYPE_RESTRICT.
...
which is still around. I suppose we can remove this bit as well.

OK for trunk if bootstrap and reg-test succeeds?

Thanks,
- Tom


Allow CAST_RESTRICT folding

2015-10-29  Tom de Vries  <tom@codesourcery.com>

	* fold-const.c (fold_unary_loc): Remove folding inhibition for restrict
	types.
---
 gcc/fold-const.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.c b/gcc/fold-const.c
index c4be017..1cd911a 100644
--- a/gcc/fold-const.c
+++ b/gcc/fold-const.c
@@ -7728,7 +7728,6 @@ fold_unary_loc (location_t loc, enum tree_code code, tree type, tree op0)
 	 that this happens when X or Y is NOP_EXPR or Y is INTEGER_CST. */
       if (POINTER_TYPE_P (type)
 	  && TREE_CODE (arg0) == POINTER_PLUS_EXPR
-	  && (!TYPE_RESTRICT (type) || TYPE_RESTRICT (TREE_TYPE (arg0)))
 	  && (TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1)) == INTEGER_CST
 	      || TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0)) == NOP_EXPR
 	      || TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1)) == NOP_EXPR))
-- 
1.9.1


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]