This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Don't handle CAST_RESTRICT (PR tree-optimization/49279)
- From: Tom de Vries <Tom_deVries at mentor dot com>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "gcc-patches at gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:38:45 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't handle CAST_RESTRICT (PR tree-optimization/49279)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
[ quote-pasted from
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg00464.html ]
CAST_RESTRICT based disambiguation unfortunately isn't reliable,
e.g. to store a non-restrict pointer into a restricted field,
we add a non-useless cast to restricted pointer in the gimplifier,
and while we don't consider that field to have a special restrict tag
because it is unsafe to do so, we unfortunately create it for the
CAST_RESTRICT before that and end up with different restrict tags
for the same thing. See the PR for more details.
This patch turns off CAST_RESTRICT handling for now, in the future
we might try to replace it by explicit CAST_RESTRICT stmts in some form,
but need to solve problems with multiple inlined copies of the same function
with restrict arguments or restrict variables in it and intermixed code from
them (or similarly code from different non-overlapping source blocks).
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
4.6 too?
2011-10-06 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/49279
* tree-ssa-structalias.c (find_func_aliases): Don't handle
CAST_RESTRICT.
* tree-ssa-forwprop.c (forward_propagate_addr_expr_1): Allow
restrict propagation.
* tree-ssa.c (useless_type_conversion_p): Don't return false
if TYPE_RESTRICT differs.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/restrict-4.c: XFAIL.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr49279.c: New test.
Hi,
In the patch adding support for CAST_RESTRICT (
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg00176.html ) there was
also a bit:
...
* fold-const.c (fold_unary_loc): Don't optimize
POINTER_PLUS_EXPR casted to TYPE_RESTRICT pointer by
casting the inner pointer if it isn't TYPE_RESTRICT.
...
which is still around. I suppose we can remove this bit as well.
OK for trunk if bootstrap and reg-test succeeds?
Thanks,
- Tom
Allow CAST_RESTRICT folding
2015-10-29 Tom de Vries <tom@codesourcery.com>
* fold-const.c (fold_unary_loc): Remove folding inhibition for restrict
types.
---
gcc/fold-const.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.c b/gcc/fold-const.c
index c4be017..1cd911a 100644
--- a/gcc/fold-const.c
+++ b/gcc/fold-const.c
@@ -7728,7 +7728,6 @@ fold_unary_loc (location_t loc, enum tree_code code, tree type, tree op0)
that this happens when X or Y is NOP_EXPR or Y is INTEGER_CST. */
if (POINTER_TYPE_P (type)
&& TREE_CODE (arg0) == POINTER_PLUS_EXPR
- && (!TYPE_RESTRICT (type) || TYPE_RESTRICT (TREE_TYPE (arg0)))
&& (TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1)) == INTEGER_CST
|| TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0)) == NOP_EXPR
|| TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1)) == NOP_EXPR))
--
1.9.1