This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Pass manager: add support for termination of pass list


On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Martin LiÅka <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
> On 10/20/2015 03:39 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Martin LiÅka <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> As part of upcoming merge of HSA branch, we would like to have possibility to terminate
>>> pass manager after execution of the HSA generation pass. The HSA back-end is implemented
>>> as a tree pass that directly emits HSAIL from gimple tree representation. The pass operates
>>> on clones created by HSA IPA pass and the pass manager should stop execution of further
>>> RTL passes.
>>>
>>> Suggested patch survives bootstrap and regression tests on x86_64-linux-pc.
>>>
>>> What do you think about it?
>>
>> Are you sure it works this way?
>>
>> Btw, you will miss executing of all the cleanup passes that will
>> eventually free memory
>> associated with the function.  So I'd rather support a
>> TODO_discard_function which
>> should basically release the body from the cgraph.
>
> Hi.
>
> Agree with you that I should execute all TODOs, which can be easily done.
> However, if I just try to introduce the suggested TODO and handle it properly
> by calling cgraph_node::release_body, then for instance fn->gimple_df, fn->cfg are
> released and I hit ICEs on many places.
>
> Stopping the pass manager looks necessary, or do I miss something?

"Stopping the pass manager" is necessary after TODO_discard_function, yes.
But that may be simply done via a has_body () check then?

> Thanks,
> Martin
>
>>
>> Richard.
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Martin
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]