This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH PR67909 PR67947]
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Yuri Rumyantsev <ysrumyan at gmail dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Igor Zamyatin <izamyatin at gmail dot com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 05:38:54 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH PR67909 PR67947]
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAEoMCqR-LXyr8xbbH6=CT0rJNSmpKTG+za257RO6Gc13RWcHyg at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Yuri Rumyantsev <ysrumyan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Here is a simple patch for unswitching outer loop through guard-edge
> hoisting. The check that guard-edge is around the inner loop was
> missed.
>
> Bootstrapping and regression testing did not show new failures.
>
> Is it OK for trunk?
>
> ChangeLog:
> 2014-10-13 Yuri Rumyantsev <ysrumyan@gmail.com>
>
> PR tree-optimization/67909, 67947
> * tree-ssa-loop-unswitch.c (find_loop_guard): Add check that GUARD_EDGE
> really skip the inner loop.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> * gcc.dg/torture/pr67947.c: New test.
+ /* Guard edge must skip inner loop. */
+ if (!dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS, loop->inner->header,
+ guard_edge == fe ? te->dest : fe->dest))
^^^^ It should line up with "CDI_DOMINATORS".
+ fprintf (dump_file, "Guard edge %d --> %d is not around the
loop!\n",guard_edge->src->index,guard_edge->dest->index);
Please break lone line.
--
H.J.