This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] reorg.c: use vec<rtx_insn *> instead of rtx_insn_list for the delay insn list


On 10/06/2015 04:50 PM, Oleg Endo wrote:
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 15:59 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 10/06/2015 03:37 PM, tbsaunde+gcc@tbsaunde.org wrote:
This seems a bit cleaner, and should involve less allocation.

I agree this is good. rtx_insn_list should die.

I tested there was no regressions for sh-sim with all languages accept
ada,lto,fortran, ok?

Could you please also build a few large source files and compare
before/after code generation to ensure there are no changes? I always
try to do this for patches like this one to avoid accidents, and this
change looks sufficiently non-mechanical to warrant it. Could also test
mips-elf.

I've ran a CSiBE comparison for "-O2 -m4-single -ml" on sh-elf.  There
are no code changes with Trev's patch.

Thanks! Good enough.


Bernd


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]