This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 10/06/2015 04:50 PM, Oleg Endo wrote:
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 15:59 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:On 10/06/2015 03:37 PM, tbsaunde+gcc@tbsaunde.org wrote:This seems a bit cleaner, and should involve less allocation.I agree this is good. rtx_insn_list should die.I tested there was no regressions for sh-sim with all languages accept ada,lto,fortran, ok?Could you please also build a few large source files and compare before/after code generation to ensure there are no changes? I always try to do this for patches like this one to avoid accidents, and this change looks sufficiently non-mechanical to warrant it. Could also test mips-elf.I've ran a CSiBE comparison for "-O2 -m4-single -ml" on sh-elf. There are no code changes with Trev's patch.
Thanks! Good enough. Bernd
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |