This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][RTL-ifcvt] PR rtl-optimization/67465: Handle pairs of complex+simple blocks and empty blocks more gracefully


On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On 25/09/15 21:03, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 09/25/2015 05:06 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Rainer,
>>>
>>> On 25/09/15 11:57, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Kyrill,
>>>>
>>>>> Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64 and x86_64.
>>>>> Rainer, could you please try this patch in combination with the one I
>>>>> sent
>>>>> earlier at:
>>>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-09/msg00815.html
>>>>
>>>> it took me quite a bit, but I've now regtested those two patches: with
>>>> them both applied, the sparc-sun-solaris2.12 build succeeds and the two
>>>> gcc.c-torture/execute/20071216-1.c failures are gone.
>>>>
>>>> So, from a SPARC POV the patches are good to go.
>>>
>>> Phew, thanks a lot!
>>>
>>> So, in conclusion the patches I'd like approval for are:
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-09/msg01306.html
>>> and
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-09/msg00815.html
>>
>> These are OK.  Thanks for taking the time to work with Rainer and sort
>> out the sparc issues.  It's greatly appreciated.
>
>
> No problem, they were my regressions to fix after all, and it's easier to
> fix now rather than in stage3/4.
>
> I've committed them with r228194 and r228195.
>

This caused:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67749


-- 
H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]