This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][AArch64][1/5] Improve immediate generation


On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 01:34:48PM +0100, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> This patch reimplements aarch64_bitmask_imm using bitwise arithmetic rather
> than a slow binary search. The algorithm searches for a sequence of set bits.
> If there are no more set bits and not all bits are set, it is a valid mask.
> Otherwise it determines the distance to the next set bit and checks the mask
> is repeated across the full 64 bits. Native performance is 5-6x faster on
> typical queries.
> 
> No change in generated code, passes GCC regression/bootstrap.

OK.

Thanks,
James

> ChangeLog:
> 2015-09-02  Wilco Dijkstra  <wdijkstr@arm.com>
> 
> 	* gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_bitmask_imm):
> 	Reimplement using faster algorithm.
> 
> ---
>  gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
> index c666dce..ba1b77e 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
> @@ -3301,19 +3301,63 @@ aarch64_movw_imm (HOST_WIDE_INT val, machine_mode mode)
>  	  || (val & (((HOST_WIDE_INT) 0xffff) << 16)) == val);
>  }
>  
> +/* Multipliers for repeating bitmasks of width 32, 16, 8, 4, and 2.  */
> +
> +static const unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT bitmask_imm_mul[] =
> +  {
> +    0x0000000100000001ull,
> +    0x0001000100010001ull,
> +    0x0101010101010101ull,
> +    0x1111111111111111ull,
> +    0x5555555555555555ull,
> +  };
> +
>  
>  /* Return true if val is a valid bitmask immediate.  */
> +
>  bool
> -aarch64_bitmask_imm (HOST_WIDE_INT val, machine_mode mode)
> +aarch64_bitmask_imm (HOST_WIDE_INT val_in, machine_mode mode)
>  {
> -  if (GET_MODE_SIZE (mode) < 8)
> -    {
> -      /* Replicate bit pattern.  */
> -      val &= (HOST_WIDE_INT) 0xffffffff;
> -      val |= val << 32;
> -    }
> -  return bsearch (&val, aarch64_bitmasks, AARCH64_NUM_BITMASKS,
> -		  sizeof (aarch64_bitmasks[0]), aarch64_bitmasks_cmp) != NULL;
> +  unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT val, tmp, mask, first_one, next_one;
> +  int bits;
> +
> +  /* Check for a single sequence of one bits and return quickly if so.
> +     The special cases of all ones and all zeroes returns false.  */
> +  val = (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) val_in;
> +  tmp = val + (val & -val);
> +
> +  if (tmp == (tmp & -tmp))
> +    return (val + 1) > 1;
> +
> +  /* Replicate 32-bit immediates so we can treat them as 64-bit.  */
> +  if (mode == SImode)
> +    val = (val << 32) | (val & 0xffffffff);
> +
> +  /* Invert if the immediate doesn't start with a zero bit - this means we
> +     only need to search for sequences of one bits.  */
> +  if (val & 1)
> +    val = ~val;
> +
> +  /* Find the first set bit and set tmp to val with the first sequence of one
> +     bits removed.  Return success if there is a single sequence of ones.  */
> +  first_one = val & -val;
> +  tmp = val & (val + first_one);
> +
> +  if (tmp == 0)
> +    return true;
> +
> +  /* Find the next set bit and compute the difference in bit position.  */
> +  next_one = tmp & -tmp;
> +  bits = clz_hwi (first_one) - clz_hwi (next_one);
> +  mask = val ^ tmp;
> +
> +  /* Check the bit position difference is a power of 2, and that the first
> +     sequence of one bits fits within 'bits' bits.  */
> +  if ((mask >> bits) != 0 || bits != (bits & -bits))
> +    return false;
> +
> +  /* Check the sequence of one bits is repeated 64/bits times.  */
> +  return val == mask * bitmask_imm_mul[__builtin_clz (bits) - 26];
>  }
>  
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.3
> 
> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]