This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 3/4] [ARM] Add attribute/pragma target fpu=




On 09/18/2015 10:40 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Christian,
(going through the patches...)

On 14/09/15 12:39, Christian Bruel wrote:
This patch splits the neon_builtins initialization into 2 internals
functions. One for NEON and one for CRYPTO, each one guarded by its own
predicate. arm_init_neon_builtins is now global to be called from
arm_valid_target_attribute_tree if needed.


diff -ruN gnu_trunk.p2/gcc/gcc/config/arm/arm-protos.h gnu_trunk.p3/gcc/gcc/config/arm/arm-protos.h
--- gnu_trunk.p2/gcc/gcc/config/arm/arm-protos.h	2015-09-11 15:23:51.852687891 +0200
+++ gnu_trunk.p3/gcc/gcc/config/arm/arm-protos.h	2015-09-11 16:30:15.833511559 +0200
@@ -213,7 +213,10 @@
   extern bool arm_change_mode_p (tree);
   #endif

-extern tree arm_valid_target_attribute_tree (tree, struct gcc_options *,
+extern void arm_init_neon_builtins (void);
+
+extern tree arm_valid_target_attribute_tree (tree,
+					     struct gcc_options *,
   					     struct gcc_options *);

Why the arm_valid_target_attribute_tree declaration here?
I don't see its relevance in this patch, and it's not mentioned in the ChangeLog.

Irrelevant formating new line chunk, I must have dropped a new line in the argument list that percolated to the patch.

Please ignore it.

Christian



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]