This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 08/09/15 11:55, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all, On 08/09/15 11:52, Alan Lawrence wrote:Ping. (Thanks, Christophe!). Original message: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg02366.html On 25/08/15 14:28, Alan Lawrence wrote:Christophe Lyon wrote:On 28 July 2015 at 13:26, Alan Lawrence <alan.lawrence@arm.com> wrote:This is a respin of https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg00488.html, fixing up the testsuite for float16 vectors. Relative to the previous version, most of the additions to the tests are now within #if..#endif such that they are only compiled if we have a scalar __fp16 type (the exception is hfloat16_t: since this is actually an integer type, we can define and use it without any compiler fp16 support). Also we try to use add_options_for_arm_neon_fp16 for all tests (on ARM targets), falling back to add_options_for_arm_neon if the previous fails. Cross-tested on many multilibs, including -march=armv6, -march=armv7-a{,-mfpu=neon-fp16}, -march=armv7-a/-mfpu=neon, -march=armv7-a/-mfp16-format=none{,/-mfpu=neon-fp16,/-mfpu=neon}, -march=armv7-a/-mfp16-format=alternative .Hi Alan, It looks OK. Did you also run the tests on AArch64?arm-wise it looks ok to me since Christophe is ok with the changes.
To be clear, this is ok for trunk.
KyrillSorry, yes, I did - aarch64-none-linux-gnu, and aarch64_be-none-elf also. Thanks, Alan
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |