This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PR64164] drop copyrename, integrate into expand
- From: Patrick Marlier <patrick dot marlier at gmail dot com>
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, James Greenhalgh <james dot greenhalgh at arm dot com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>, Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Christophe Lyon <christophe dot lyon at linaro dot org>, David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 06:53:14 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PR64164] drop copyrename, integrate into expand
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <orio9cw10j dot fsf at livre dot home> <CAFiYyc3k9xh_6RGbTdHYOJ-aEmUWVeFRoWy=YzCHFDNSdtTXCA at mail dot gmail dot com> <orwpxqvqnp dot fsf at livre dot home> <20150723203112 dot GB27818 at gate dot crashing dot org> <CAMe9rOpR+2gPxo0tKaRPtcML_Q4=r-_=9iqk+_JZFPkM=eN=BQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMe9rOpbLEyDexVJqJAFJ3W6o4AktNog-jwk2CY4GZkrmT+nfA at mail dot gmail dot com> <or4mkmhgc9 dot fsf at livre dot home> <CAMe9rOp=S5fu1N=i7waswCYqJeLBCrySqYdFYkVa7LV04vpQSg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMe9rOrq+ZBAg1nZ1twEcPqwBj4j9+XA+SXQJVWWzjfdvidjtw at mail dot gmail dot com> <or1tfkdjhj dot fsf at livre dot home> <20150810082355 dot GA31149 at arm dot com> <55C8BFC3 dot 3030603 at redhat dot com>
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 08/10/2015 02:23 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 12:45:28AM +0100, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 30, 2015, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> aoliva/pr64164 is fine on x32.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks. I have made a large number of changes since you tested it,
>>> fixing all the reported issues and then some. Now, x86_64-linux-gnu
>>> (-m64 and -m32), i686-pc-linux-gnu, powerpc64-linux-gnu and
>>> powerpc64el-linux-gnu pass regstrap (r226317), and the many tens of
>>> targets I cross-tested still get the same 'make all' errors that the
>>> pristine tree did.
>>
>>
>> For what it is worth, I bootstrapped and tested the consolidated patch
>> on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf and aarch64-none-linux-gnu with trunk at
>> r226516 over the weekend, and didn't see any new issues.
>
> Thanks -- I know it's been a long road on this patch. I don't think anyone
> would have ever guessed fixing 64164 would be so complex.
Especially as the bug reporter, I am impressed how a slight problem
can lead to such a patch! ;)
Thanks a lot Alexandre!
I feel like I owe you something for this hard work!
Feel free to ping if I can help you with something or I owe you at
least a beer when you will be around Switzerland. :)
--
Pat