This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Add X != !X pattern


On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Andreas Schwab wrote:

> Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> writes:
> 
> > 	* gimple-fold.c (gimple_fold_stmt_to_constant_1): Canonicalize
> > 	bool compares on RHS.
> > 	* match.pd: Add X ==/!= !X is false/true pattern.
> 
> ERROR in VTST/VTSTQ (/opt/gcc/gcc-20150805/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vtst.c line 97 in buffer 'expected_signed') at type uint8x8 index 1: got 0x1 != 0xff  (signed input)
> FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vtst.c   -O1  execution test
> FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/simd/int_comparisons_1.c scan-assembler-times [ \t]cmtst[ \t]+v[0-9]+.[0-9]+[bshd],[ \t]*v[0-9]+.[0-9]+[bshd],[ \t]+v[0-9]+.[0-9]+[bshd] 14
> FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/simd/int_comparisons_1.c scan-assembler-times [ \t]cmtst[ \t]+d[0-9]+,[ \t]*d[0-9]+,[ \t]+d[0-9]+ 4
> FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/simd/int_comparisons_2.c execution test
> FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/singleton_intrinsics_1.c scan-assembler-times \\tcmtst\\td[0-9]+, d[0-9]+, d[0-9]+ 2

Ick - somebody will have to come up with a reduced testcase for one of
this (best an execute fail).  Reduced to one failing case so I can
investigate with a cross compiler.

Eventually smells like a aarch64 vector specific issue or a latent
issue with the truth_valued_p predicate for vector types.

Richard.
 
> Andreas.
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]