This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [debug-early] fix problem with template parameter packs

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>, Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 17:34:05 -0400
Subject: Re: [debug-early] fix problem with template parameter packs
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <55482AF6 dot 1090207 at redhat dot com> <5549314D dot 6080804 at redhat dot com> <5549373F dot 6020503 at redhat dot com> <554A4146 dot 4010501 at redhat dot com> <5564A158 dot 8010604 at redhat dot com> <55661C58 dot 6040305 at redhat dot com> <556EFB62 dot 3040209 at redhat dot com> <CAFiYyc0ED7vRnfK+fC8u4wo0XJWfYznYe3Dhgp4Qw1U5U73ULw at mail dot gmail dot com> <556F1256 dot 1030400 at redhat dot com>

On 06/03/2015 10:42 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:

-  if (decl && (DECL_ABSTRACT_P (decl) || declaration || old_die == NULL))
+  if (decl && (DECL_ABSTRACT_P (decl)
+	       || !old_die || is_declaration_die (old_die)))

Do we still need DECL_ABSTRACT_P? I wouldn't expect to get here whenemitting the abstract function, as we should already have a die fromearly dwarf.


Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [debug-early] fix problem with template parameter packs
  - From: Aldy Hernandez

References:
- Re: [debug-early] fix problem with template parameter packs
  - From: Aldy Hernandez
- Re: [debug-early] fix problem with template parameter packs
  - From: Richard Biener
- Re: [debug-early] fix problem with template parameter packs
  - From: Aldy Hernandez

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]