This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Patch] [X86_64]: fix operand constraints in sse3_mwait


Hi Uros, 

As discussed here https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2015-06/msg00043.html

I am going to install the following patch to trunk.

GCC bootstrap and regressions tests passed.

Regards,
Venkat.

diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index ab5c004..2fa6e96 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2015-06-04  Venkataramanan Kumar  <Venkataramanan.kumar>
+
+       * config/i386/sse.md (sse3_mwait): Swap the operand constraints.
+
 2015-06-02  Alan Modra  <amodra@gmail.com>

        * config/rs6000/vsx.md (vsx_extract_v4sf): Revert accidental
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
index 21c6c6c..2685f06 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
@@ -13194,10 +13194,12 @@
    (set_attr "atom_sse_attr" "fence")
    (set_attr "memory" "unknown")])

-
+;; As per AMD and Intel ISA manuals, the first operand is extensions
+;; and it goes to %ecx. The second operand received is hints and it goes
+;; to %eax.
 (define_insn "sse3_mwait"
-  [(unspec_volatile [(match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "a")
-                    (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "c")]
+  [(unspec_volatile [(match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "c")
+                    (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "a")]
                    UNSPECV_MWAIT)]
   "TARGET_SSE3"
 ;; 64bit version is "mwait %rax,%rcx". But only lower 32bits are used.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]