This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 08:00:33PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote: >>> 2015-03-18 Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> >>> >>> PR rtl-optimization/60851 >>> * recog.c (constrain_operands): Accept a pseudo register before reload >>> for LRA enabled targets. > >> As the two adjacent conditions are mostly the same, perhaps it might be >> better written as >> || ((/* Before reload, accept a pseudo, since >> LRA can turn it into a mem. >> (targetm.lra_p () && strict < 0) >> /* During reload, accept a pseudo. */ >> || reload_in_progress) >> && REG_P (op) >> && REGNO (op) >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER))) >> >> or put REG_P && REGNO checks first and only then test when. > > Yeah, I thought about this particular CSE a bit. But since these are > two conceptually different conditions, and the formatting (and > comments) just didn't fit into available space, I wrote it this way. > IMO, it is more readable, better follows the intended logic, and > avoids even more indents. > > Also, I am pretty sure that any decent compiler can CSE this part on its own. > > However, the condition can be slightly improved by rewriting it to: > > /* Before reload, accept a pseudo, > since LRA can turn it into a mem. */ > || (strict < 0 && targetm.lra_p () && REG_P (op) > && REGNO (op) >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER) > > so, we have cheaper tests in the front to shortcut more expensive tests later. > >> For 4.9 backport, please wait a few days after it goes into the trunk. Attached is the 4.9 branch version of the patch. There were substantial cleanups [1] in this area for 5.0, so comparing to trunk version, the patch includes two more places that have to be changed. Patch was bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu {,-m32}. If there are no objections, I plan to commit this version to the branch in a couple of days. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg00530.html Uros.
Attachment:
p-49.diff.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |