This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] fix PR65048: check that jump-thread paths are still valid
- From: Sebastian Pop <sebpop at gmail dot com>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "Brian M. Rzycki" <brzycki at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 17:26:25 +0000
- Subject: Re: [patch] fix PR65048: check that jump-thread paths are still valid
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20150213235033 dot GA20179 at f1 dot c dot bardezibar dot internal> <54E2E67D dot 7030109 at redhat dot com> <20150218222723 dot GA24606 at f1 dot c dot bardezibar dot internal> <54EBB147 dot 2080400 at redhat dot com> <20150225191843 dot GA13649 at f1 dot c dot bardezibar dot internal> <54EE385A dot 9000503 at redhat dot com>
Jeff Law wrote:
> On 02/25/15 12:18, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> >Jeff Law wrote:
> >>On 02/18/15 15:27, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> >>>>The dumps for the FSM threads are a bit sparse -- they don't show
> >>>>the entire path. That makes it much harder to see what's going on.
> >>>
> >>>Would a patch improving the FSM dumps ok to commit separately to trunk?
> >>Most definitely. I realize we're in stage4, but I'd approve such a change.
> >
> >Attached:
> >
> > * tree-ssa-threadupdate.c (dump_jump_thread_path): Print all edges
> > of an EDGE_FSM_THREAD.
> >
> >I'm regstrapping on x86_64-linux. Ok for trunk if it passes?
> Yes.
Committed r221021.
Sebastian