This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix rotate discovery in fold-const.c (PR tree-optimization/65014)


On Thu, 12 Feb 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> We pass the values after STRIP_NOPS to *ROTATE_EXPR build, which is
> undesirable, as the testcase shows, the operand could very well end up being
> a pointer rather than integer.

Ugh, indeed tree_nop_conversion_p allows conversion to/from pointer 
types...  (I wonder if tree_nop_conversion_p should simply map to
useless_type_conversion_p ... for example tree_nop_conversion_p
happily drops conversion between pointers to different address-spaces).

Of course useless_type_conversion_p preserves sign-changes as well.

> This patch fixes it by passing the original trees instead.
> Alternatively we could fold_convert the STRIP_NOPS result to the original
> type, but I'd be afraid that in the common case that would just create more
> GC garbage.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

Ok.

Thanks,
Richard.

> 2015-02-12  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
> 
> 	PR tree-optimization/65014
> 	* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc): When creating {L,R}ROTATE_EXPR,
> 	use original second operand of arg0 or arg1 instead of
> 	that adjusted by STRIP_NOPS.
> 
> 	* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr65014.c: New test.
> 
> --- gcc/fold-const.c.jj	2015-01-22 19:30:59.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/fold-const.c	2015-02-11 15:06:52.628078961 +0100
> @@ -10261,7 +10261,9 @@ fold_binary_loc (location_t loc,
>  		tem = build2_loc (loc, LROTATE_EXPR,
>  				  TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0)),
>  				  TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0),
> -				  code0 == LSHIFT_EXPR ? tree01 : tree11);
> +				  code0 == LSHIFT_EXPR
> +				  ? TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1)
> +				  : TREE_OPERAND (arg1, 1));
>  		return fold_convert_loc (loc, type, tem);
>  	      }
>  	    else if (code11 == MINUS_EXPR)
> @@ -10283,7 +10285,8 @@ fold_binary_loc (location_t loc,
>  					       ? LROTATE_EXPR
>  					       : RROTATE_EXPR),
>  					      TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0)),
> -					      TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0), tree01));
> +					      TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0),
> +					      TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1)));
>  	      }
>  	    else if (code01 == MINUS_EXPR)
>  	      {
> @@ -10304,7 +10307,7 @@ fold_binary_loc (location_t loc,
>  				? LROTATE_EXPR
>  				: RROTATE_EXPR),
>  			       TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0)),
> -			       TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0), tree11));
> +			       TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0), TREE_OPERAND (arg1, 1)));
>  	      }
>  	  }
>        }
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr65014.c.jj	2015-02-11 15:21:19.175681614 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr65014.c	2015-02-11 15:22:18.040703653 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +/* PR tree-optimization/65014 */
> +/* { dg-do compile { target int32plus } } */
> +
> +extern int x;
> +
> +unsigned
> +foo (unsigned int y)
> +{
> +  return (y << ((__INTPTR_TYPE__) &x)) | (y >> (32 - ((__INTPTR_TYPE__) &x)));
> +}
> 
> 	Jakub
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild,
Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]