This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Another ptx offloading patch
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:10:58 +0100
- Subject: Re: Another ptx offloading patch
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <546DDFB4 dot 9050302 at codesourcery dot com> <54B80872 dot 4040406 at redhat dot com> <CAFiYyc00jyrHcm7cHKxzkAGJHnzb7xaZfp-rupdLn8WY5uyq8Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <20150204103848 dot GK1746 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <CAFiYyc1mbyq7a3Zbg=vqS5c2ogqamAy1Kc0uxBj72ij4NeQCjQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <54D9F437 dot 2000907 at codesourcery dot com>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 01:06:15PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 02/10/2015 11:34 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> >Bernds patch is ok with the unrelated gcc.c hunk removed.
>
> Thanks. I'm assuming this is for the next stage 1?
No, for current trunk, we don't want to ship with offloading
to nvptx completely broken, which is my understanding of the
current state.
There is another patch that has been approved already,
nvptx offloading patches [1/n] (and I think hasn't been committed yet),
then there is the va_list issue where I'm afraid your patch will break
normal LTO badly, it would be nice to discuss that. And finally
for the enum machine_mode translation, I've started working on some patch,
but didn't get too far yet, interrupted by other tasks.
Jakub