This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[PATCH] PR 64256
- From: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 21:32:07 -0500
- Subject: [PATCH] PR 64256
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
After a lot of investigation, I believe that I have learned why stabs
debugging on AIX disabled use of continuations. GDB, IBM DBX and IBM
XLDB are able to work with stab string continuations produced by GCC.
I am enabling it using definitions that match the behavior of IBM XL
compilers to avoid any unexpected behavior and hopefully be able to
reproduce any future errors with native tools to expedite fixes.
XCOFF32 uses an unsigned short for the stabstring length for a maximum
length of 64K, but XLC limits the size to 16K. XLC also uses '?' as a
continuation character instead of '\\'. GDB accepts '?' as an
alternate continuation character.
Bootstrapped on powerpc-ibm-aix7.1.0.0.
Committed.
Thanks, David
PR debug/2714
PR bootstrap/64256
* xcoffout.h (DBX_CONTIN_LENGTH): Define as 16384.
(DBX_CONTIN_CHAR): Define.
Index: xcoffout.h
===================================================================
--- xcoffout.h (revision 220500)
+++ xcoffout.h (working copy)
@@ -161,9 +161,12 @@
/* Do not emit any marker for XCOFF until assembler allows XFT_CV. */
#define NO_DBX_GCC_MARKER
-/* Do not break .stabs pseudos into continuations. */
-#define DBX_CONTIN_LENGTH 0
+/* XCOFF32 maximum length is 64K; XLC limits to 16K. */
+#define DBX_CONTIN_LENGTH 16384
+/* XLC uses '?' as continuation character. */
+#define DBX_CONTIN_CHAR '?'
+
/* Don't try to use the `x' type-cross-reference character in DBX data.