This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On 30 January 2015 at 20:25, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote: > On 01/30/2015 01:13 PM, Ville Voutilainen wrote: >>> >>> Why would void *const volatile still be trivial? >> >> >> Arrrrggggh. It isn't. YES and YES2 are macros, so YES2(void*) expands to >> is_trivial<const volatile void*>::value, which is true, whereas >> is_trivial<void* const volatile>::value is false. >> >> I think it would be reasonable to convert these macros in that test into >> function templates, no? :) > > > Makes sense to me. :) > > Jason So, a new patch attached. The only change to the previous one is the change to the trivial1.C test.
Attachment:
pr63959_5.diff
Description: Text document
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |