This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [[ARM/AArch64][testsuite] 03/36] Add vmax, vmin, vhadd, vhsub and vrhadd tests.


On 19 January 2015 at 14:29, Marcus Shawcroft
<marcus.shawcroft@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 16 January 2015 at 17:52, Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>>> OK provided, as per the previous couple, that we don;t regression or
>>> introduce new fails on aarch64[_be] or aarch32.
>>
>> This patch shows failures on aarch64 and aarch64_be for vmax and vmin
>> when the input is -NaN.
>> It's a corner case, and my reading of the ARM ARM is that the result
>> should the same as on aarch32.
>> I haven't had time to look at it in more details though.
>> So, not OK?
>
> They should have the same behaviour in aarch32 and aarch64. Did you
> test on HW or a model?
>
I ran the tests on qemu for aarch32 and aarch64-linux, and on the
foundation model for aarch64*-elf.

> /Marcus


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]