This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [debug-early] C++ clones and limbo DIEs

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
Cc: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 15:45:08 -0500
Subject: Re: [debug-early] C++ clones and limbo DIEs
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <54B87E5B dot 1090502 at redhat dot com> <54B88149 dot 1040906 at redhat dot com> <54B94F4D dot 4040009 at redhat dot com>

On 01/16/2015 12:50 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:

Can you remove the first flush and just do it in the second place?


If I only flush the limbo list in the second place, that's basically
what mainline does, albeit abstracted into a function.  I thought the
whole point was to get rid of the limbo list, or at least keep it from
being a structure that has to go through LTO streaming.


It would expect it to be before free_lang_data and LTO streaming.

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [debug-early] C++ clones and limbo DIEs
  - From: Aldy Hernandez

References:
- [debug-early] C++ clones and limbo DIEs
  - From: Aldy Hernandez
- Re: [debug-early] C++ clones and limbo DIEs
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [debug-early] C++ clones and limbo DIEs
  - From: Aldy Hernandez

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]