Re: [Patch, Fortran, OOP] PR 63733: [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] wrong resolution for OPERATOR generics

[Paul Richard Thomas <paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com>]

Dear Janus,

Since it is a regression, by all means update the branches. We
usually, propose delaying a bit but I am not convinced that this is
effective for this kind of bug fix - usually, further problems take a
long time to emerge. Thus, I would recommend that you get on with it.

Thanks

Paul

On 11 January 2015 at 23:01, Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>> Well done for sorting that out. OK for trunk.
>
> Thanks, Paul. Committed as r219440.
>
> What about the branches?
>
> Cheers,
> Janus
>
>
>
>> On 11 January 2015 at 14:38, Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> this patch fixes a wrong-code regression related to operators, by
>>> making sure that we look for typebound operators first, before looking
>>> for non-typebound ones. (Note: Each typebound operator is also added
>>> to the list of non-typebound ones, for reasons of diagnostics.)
>>>
>>> Regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk? 4.9/4.8?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Janus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-01-11  Janus Weil  <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
>>>
>>>     PR fortran/63733
>>>     * interface.c (gfc_extend_expr): Look for type-bound operators before
>>>     non-typebound ones.
>>>
>>> 2015-01-11  Janus Weil  <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
>>>
>>>     PR fortran/63733
>>>     * gfortran.dg/typebound_operator_20.f90: New.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's
>> too dark to read.
>>
>> Groucho Marx



-- 
Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's
too dark to read.

Groucho Marx