This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: [PATCH] Disable -fuse-caller-save when -pg is active



> -----Original Message-----
> From: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Radovan Obradovic
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 11:01 AM
> To: Jeff Law; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Petar Jovanovic
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Disable -fuse-caller-save when -pg is active
> 
> 
> Patch has been tested with DejaGnu gcc test suite on mips32r2 cross
> compiler and bootstrapped and tested on
> x86_64 native compiler.
> 
Thanks for finishing up the testing.  Would you like me to check this in for you?

> ________________________________________
> From: Jeff Law [law@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 1:18 PM
> To: Radovan Obradovic; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Petar Jovanovic
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Disable -fuse-caller-save when -pg is active
> 
> On 11/14/14 10:10, Radovan Obradovic wrote:
> > Thank you for the quick reply.
> >
> >> Please repost after updating to test HAVE_prologue and HAVE_epilogue
> >> and adding a testcase.
> >
> > I have managed to reproduce the problem on the small test case on
> > mips32, but the test is architecture independent and should probably
> > fail on many other ports without this patch. The optimization is also
> > disabled if macros HAVE_prologue and HAVE_epilogue are not defined or
> > have false value.
> Thanks.  This looks good.  I forgot to ask in my prior message, has this patch
> been bootstrapped and regression tested?  If so, on what platform?
> 
> Jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]