This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: [PATCH] Disable -fuse-caller-save when -pg is active
- From: "Moore, Catherine" <Catherine_Moore at mentor dot com>
- To: Radovan Obradovic <Radovan dot Obradovic at imgtec dot com>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Cc: Petar Jovanovic <Petar dot Jovanovic at imgtec dot com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 14:48:59 +0000
- Subject: RE: [PATCH] Disable -fuse-caller-save when -pg is active
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <B580B8E56670DB4993CF59CB657624A84D610631 at BADAG02 dot ba dot imgtec dot org>,<5464E8A8 dot 9060902 at redhat dot com> <B580B8E56670DB4993CF59CB657624A84D6108DF at BADAG02 dot ba dot imgtec dot org>,<546A6620 dot 8090703 at redhat dot com> <B580B8E56670DB4993CF59CB657624A84D610E5E at BADAG02 dot ba dot imgtec dot org>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Radovan Obradovic
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 11:01 AM
> To: Jeff Law; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Petar Jovanovic
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Disable -fuse-caller-save when -pg is active
>
>
> Patch has been tested with DejaGnu gcc test suite on mips32r2 cross
> compiler and bootstrapped and tested on
> x86_64 native compiler.
>
Thanks for finishing up the testing. Would you like me to check this in for you?
> ________________________________________
> From: Jeff Law [law@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 1:18 PM
> To: Radovan Obradovic; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Petar Jovanovic
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Disable -fuse-caller-save when -pg is active
>
> On 11/14/14 10:10, Radovan Obradovic wrote:
> > Thank you for the quick reply.
> >
> >> Please repost after updating to test HAVE_prologue and HAVE_epilogue
> >> and adding a testcase.
> >
> > I have managed to reproduce the problem on the small test case on
> > mips32, but the test is architecture independent and should probably
> > fail on many other ports without this patch. The optimization is also
> > disabled if macros HAVE_prologue and HAVE_epilogue are not defined or
> > have false value.
> Thanks. This looks good. I forgot to ask in my prior message, has this patch
> been bootstrapped and regression tested? If so, on what platform?
>
> Jeff