This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, x86] Fix pblendv expand.
- From: Evgeny Stupachenko <evstupac at gmail dot com>
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 19:38:45 +0300
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, x86] Fix pblendv expand.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAOvf_xxs3bOHcPCy_RyUQ7Tw=+KRodLZSidHgg7wPW=+WKi4qA at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFULd4ZR3BG+QyxYZoceniFLHmxWoYUGh=WfCufNAVu8Pe1EmQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFULd4ZFyyBnegJtUQkeVTOk-oPbO5LO_WQdsV2TBMYEh5cxJg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAOvf_xzW3HWNhG6R6AzjS34ABySGaOFo+cM26P7ubEjUhN_YLw at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAOvf_xxkCnxx_VRpp6AgEfs1DYJ+NU0ebDZGicd4=MG29Dor9g at mail dot gmail dot com> <54872141 dot 3070102 at redhat dot com>
I mean that there are a lot of people tracking spec2006 stability and
therefore the issue should be on track in future.
And that I can create the test case, but it would be as big as several
GCC functions.
Will work on reducing the test case.
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 12/09/2014 07:59 AM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
>> However patch is fixing spec2006 benchmark. Shouldn't that be enough
>> for regression testing?
>>
>
> No. Spec is not free.
>
>
> r~