This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] DWARF add DW_AT_noreturn on noreturn function subprogram.
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Cary Coutant <ccoutant at google dot com>, Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 22:54:59 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] DWARF add DW_AT_noreturn on noreturn function subprogram.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1416956221-26727-1-git-send-email-mjw at redhat dot com> <547CDE33 dot 4030706 at redhat dot com> <CAHACq4r3uwbiV-nj2M65c_gOL1QOPU2QJ87jry2G+=YyAS6UKg at mail dot gmail dot com> <547CE2C1 dot 6010802 at redhat dot com>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 02:50:57PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 12/01/14 14:44, Cary Coutant wrote:
> >>Presumably we don't have any sense when the values will be assigned, right?
> >>Any chance we could speed that along a bit?
> >
> >As Jason said, the value in the current draft is unlikely to change,
> >and I think he and I can probably lobby to keep it unchanged if there
> >any danger that the numbering will change. The committee doesn't
> >really like it when we jump the gun and use values before the final
> >spec is published, but as a practical matter, it's often necessary and
> >(at this stage) pretty safe.
> Rather than having to lobby to keep it unchanged because we jumped the gun,
> can we lobby to get the number assigned in the near future rather than in
> the potentially far future? That feels more cooperative to me :-)
>
> Would that make Michael happier?
The numbers are assigned and there is a working draft with those numbers,
the thing is just that there is no 100% guarantee they won't be removed or
reassigned. But as Jason/Cary said, we can lobby of for them being kept the
same.
Jakub