This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH x86] Increase PARAM_MAX_COMPLETELY_PEELED_INSNS when branch is costly
- From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>
- To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
- Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Evgeny Stupachenko <evstupac at gmail dot com>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 11:09:54 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH x86] Increase PARAM_MAX_COMPLETELY_PEELED_INSNS when branch is costly
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAOvf_xwBqY++PGRC_+1=rzHO18jvc+TP5mmR=PjYvGgm=63NuA at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAOvf_xxUaOkzzyVZp1nzq8Uw63tfuTyneSzhkoLwanzVw32_4g at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFULd4Yo2FByv26QYEEOv2NN2n=sdFcuGmP+sd3j88n-xjbqRw at mail dot gmail dot com> <32201320 dot a2T5pL3L4j at polaris>
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:
>> OK. Looks like a good performance vs. codesize tradeoff.
>
> Yes, but IMO this should be done in the generic code, unrolling small loops is
> profitable on most architectures.
Yeah, but after a couple of pings for a generic change, we went the target way.
Uros.