This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, MPX runtime 1/2] Integrate MPX runtime library
- From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Ilya Enkovich <enkovich dot gnu at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Andi Kleen <andi at firstfloor dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 23:21:23 +0000
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, MPX runtime 1/2] Integrate MPX runtime library
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20141111153449 dot GB52080 at msticlxl57 dot ims dot intel dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1411111754330 dot 26374 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <87r3x9a7yt dot fsf at tassilo dot jf dot intel dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1411112016450 dot 12642 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <20141112160432 dot GA5697 at msticlxl57 dot ims dot intel dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1411122125170 dot 31875 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <CAMbmDYamHxfspd6MXEbc+ZP7Psef+YtpTCL6RDnkoiMS35CAsA at mail dot gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1411122259240 dot 31875 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <CAMbmDYbSg4nrktxpkzZR862kaWHpFoheMugTNUJ5-UZQDi+0nw at mail dot gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1411132041130 dot 5050 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <20141119141555 dot GD47331 at msticlxl57 dot ims dot intel dot com>
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> > If it's intended only as the latter - and this is documented - then you
> > don't have the libgcc-like requirements, and there's no point in having
> > multiple libraries. If it's intended for both, that points the way to
> > separate libraries (where the debugging-tool library would be used in that
> > use case, but the crash-reporter-interception case would expect programs
> > to have been linked with only the minimal library).
>
> Would it be enough to mention implicit link and resulting pthread
> dependency in -fcheck-pointer-bounds description in invoke.texi?
Well, that and say explicitly that it's intended as a debugging tool
rather than for general hardening.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
- References:
- [PATCH, MPX runtime 1/2] Integrate MPX runtime library
- Re: [PATCH, MPX runtime 1/2] Integrate MPX runtime library
- Re: [PATCH, MPX runtime 1/2] Integrate MPX runtime library
- Re: [PATCH, MPX runtime 1/2] Integrate MPX runtime library
- Re: [PATCH, MPX runtime 1/2] Integrate MPX runtime library
- Re: [PATCH, MPX runtime 1/2] Integrate MPX runtime library
- Re: [PATCH, MPX runtime 1/2] Integrate MPX runtime library
- Re: [PATCH, MPX runtime 1/2] Integrate MPX runtime library
- Re: [PATCH, MPX runtime 1/2] Integrate MPX runtime library
- Re: [PATCH, MPX runtime 1/2] Integrate MPX runtime library
- Re: [PATCH, MPX runtime 1/2] Integrate MPX runtime library