This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix regressions in libgomp testsuite: set flag_fat_lto_objects for offload
- From: Ilya Verbin <iverbin at gmail dot com>
- To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Kirill Yukhin <kirill dot yukhin at gmail dot com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 19:51:13 +0300
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix regressions in libgomp testsuite: set flag_fat_lto_objects for offload
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20141114160441 dot GA40445 at msticlxl57 dot ims dot intel dot com> <20141114160709 dot GB40445 at msticlxl57 dot ims dot intel dot com> <CAMe9rOrWfiVPBDkQ03P2+jsN1CunN3F3eCeCMsf2UwQ+455JZw at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 14 Nov 08:46, H.J. Lu wrote:
> What happens when -flto is used on command line? Will we
> generate both LTO IR and offload IR?
Right.
I'm not sure whether we should make slim objects in case of LTO + offload IR...
-- Ilya