This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PR c/52952] More precise locations within format strings
- From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Dodji Seketeli <dodji at redhat dot com>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:49:37 +0000
- Subject: Re: [PR c/52952] More precise locations within format strings
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAESRpQCBPF9n7yHz=UJ9ykA+tPsR5d26JM_c_C-fW3=ByU0RyA at mail dot gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1411071753330 dot 23749 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <CAESRpQCLxArs35sRBhS8pTiqFcj2JuAqsOufYQAxGs_CvSM5tA at mail dot gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1411072137480 dot 16602 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <CAESRpQAOaJ-_ZcsBx+rP7AhSFgY8zPEpAO+rr8-746hh7qkz6g at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Sat, 8 Nov 2014, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> On 7 November 2014 22:39, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> >> Neither Per nor Tom are active in GCC anymore. If the FE maintainers
> >> do not feel comfortable reviewing line-map changes, could you nominate
> >> Dodji as line-map maintainer if he is willing to accept it? I think he
> >> is currently the person that understands that code best.
> >
> > I think Dodji as diagnostics maintainer is better placed than I am to
> > review line-map patches.
>
> Then, do you mean that line-map falls under the reach of the
> diagnostics maintainer? I agree, but Dodji himself does not seem to be
> sure about this:
I think we should consider it to be covered by diagnostics maintainers.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com