This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: genmatch infinite loop during bootstrap on AIX


On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, David Edelsohn wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Richard Biener
> <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 6:13 PM, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Richard Biener
> >> <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Because only genmatch calls functions from libstdc++.  Btw, why
> >>> would genmatch miscompile an empty function or the call to it?
> >>
> >> I tried bootstrapping with libstdc++ built without the AIX ld "-G"
> >> flag and that is succeeding.
> >>
> >> "-G" produces a shared object for use with SVR4-style runtime linking,
> >> so this version of libstdc++ no longer allows runtime function
> >> interposition, e.g., operator new, although it is not used frequently.
> >> Something about the GCC-produced tail calls is interacting badly with
> >> that feature.
> >>
> >> Note that this makes GCC bootstrap on AIX very fragile at the moment
> >> because it depends on how libstdc++ was built in previous releases.  I
> >> can bootstrap with GCC 4.6.3 and 4.8.1 but not with 4.7.3, 4.8.0, nor
> >> 4.9.0.  A problematic libstdc++ from earlier releases causes genmatch
> >> to loop in stage 1.
> >
> > I see.  A bootstrap with IPA ICF disabled did not succeed but runs into
> > the same issue in stage2.  So I wonder if the issue is latent for much
> > longer and genmatch just exposes it now.
> >
> > I'll see if I can remove the use of std::map from genmatch as a
> > workaround.
> 
> I assume that this is a pervasive issue in the interaction between GCC
> optimizations and AIX -G linker option. Something expects the second
> call to point to a different implementation. I don't know if the
> address in the TOC (GOT) is wrong or something expects the second call
> to use a different TOC, but there is a circular reference.
> 
> I am going to apply a patch to GCC to not build libstdc++ with -G.  I
> also will apply it to GCC 4.9 branch.  I was hoping that it could be
> included in GCC 4.9.2, but I needed to test it thoroughly and Jakub
> beat me with the release.

As it might only affect static linking(?) it might be a good idea to
run the libstdc++ testsuite with statically linking libstdc++
(-static-libstdc++) before/after such change?

That is,

make check-target-libstdc++-v3 
RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/-static-libstdc++"

(hopefully that is able to add to link flags and not compile-flags only)

Thanks,
Richard.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]