This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH x86] Increase PARAM_MAX_COMPLETELY_PEELED_INSNS when branch is costly
- From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>
- To: Evgeny Stupachenko <evstupac at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 09:10:30 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH x86] Increase PARAM_MAX_COMPLETELY_PEELED_INSNS when branch is costly
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAOvf_xwBqY++PGRC_+1=rzHO18jvc+TP5mmR=PjYvGgm=63NuA at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFiYyc1YjAYk8M8QMp=2Uo11SoQmZtcj-Eb=L-gxLyQ=6GTXmA at mail dot gmail dot com> <20141013122332 dot GA9404 at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz> <CAOvf_xyG3f9uCTLr3D_Kxo_4i+FHcACzZvcUtojT=EbLxXBRPQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAOvf_xxiB3UNBU98YPVHxe3YEkxG7Tiyy9_RPU9synU+pSpcoA at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko <evstupac@gmail.com> wrote:
> make check for gcc passed
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Evgeny Stupachenko <evstupac@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The results are the same for Silvermont.
>> There are no significant changes on Haswell.
>> So I agree with Richard, let's enable this x86 wide.
>>
>> Bootstrap/ passed.
>> Make check in progress.
>> Is it ok?
>>
>> 2014-10-25 Evgeny Stupachenko <evstupac@gmail.com>
>> * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_option_override_internal): Increase
>> PARAM_MAX_COMPLETELY_PEELED_INSNS.
Let's wait for Honza's approval ...
Uros.