This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] Second basic-block.h restructuring patch.
- From: Jiong Wang <jiong dot wang at arm dot com>
- To: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:48:29 +0100
- Subject: Re: [patch] Second basic-block.h restructuring patch.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <544552B7 dot 8070007 at redhat dot com>
On 20/10/14 19:21, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
creates cfg.h, cfganal.h, lcm.h, and loop-unroll.h to house the
prototypes for those .c files.
cfganal.h also gets "struct edge_list" and "class control_dependences"
definitions since that is where all the routines and manipulators are
declared.
loop-unroll.h only exports 2 routines, so rather than including that
in basic-block.h I simply included it from the 2 .c files which consume
those routines. Again, the other includes will be flattened out of
basic-block.h to just their consumers later.
loop-unroll.c also had one function I marked as static since it wasn't
actually used anywhere else.
bootstraps on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, and regressions are running... I
expect no regressions because of the nature of the changes. OK to
check in assuming everything is OK?
Happen to start a fresh build
../gcc/configure --target=arm-none-linux-gnueabihf --enable-languages=c,c++
with the following error.
cnumber -I../../gcc/gcc/../libbacktrace -o loop-doloop.o -MT loop-doloop.o -MMD -MP -MF ./.deps/loop-doloop.TPo ../../gcc/gcc/loop-doloop.c
../../gcc/gcc/loop-doloop.c: In function ‘bool add_test(rtx, edge_def**, basic_block)’:
../../gcc/gcc/loop-doloop.c:371:38: error: ‘split_edge_and_insert’ was not declared in this scope
Andrew