This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [pointer size] more edge cases


> I don't see what the stor-layout.c changes have to do with that
> description, or why they are correct (they look wrong to me; the
> existing addition of BITS_PER_UNIT_LOG + 1 looks logically correct
> for bitsizetype).

sooo... the type for bitsizetype will *always* be a bigger type than
sizetype?  Even when sizetype is already the largest type the target
can handle naturally?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]