This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, Pointer Bounds Checker 14/x] Passes [10/n] Stores handler

On 10/13/14 05:23, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2014-10-09 22:51 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law <>:
On 10/08/14 13:12, Ilya Enkovich wrote:


This patch adds an assignment processing function which is used by lnliner
for newly generated stores.

2014-10-08  Ilya Enkovich  <>

         * tree-chkp.c (chkp_copy_bounds_for_assign): New.
         * tree-chkp.h (chkp_copy_bounds_for_assign): New.

This probably should have been part of the inliner submission since that's
the only place its used and one needs the inliner context to know how this
function is going to be used.

Presumably the reason its not in tree-inline and static is you want to
utilize chkp_walk_pointer_assignments?

The code is fine, just want to make sure its goes into a logical place.


I have to export either chkp_copy_bounds_for_assign or
chkp_walk_pointer_assignments with chkp_copy_bounds_for_elem.  No much
difference but I'd prefer to keep all memrefs processing codes in

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]