This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: parallel check output changes?

On 10/02/2014 02:14 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 06:46:19PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Segher Boessenkool <> writes:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:54:57AM -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
Is this suppose to be resolved now?  I'm still seeing some issues with a
branch cut from mainline from yesterday.
Confirmed.  The following patch works for me, and Andrew has tested it
as well.  The comment it removes isn't valid before the patch either.
I get the impression from a short dismissal like that that this script
is pretty hated :-(.
I meant that it isn't valid currently; it was valid before the parallelisation
patches.  It would be nice if we could reconstruct the original order somehow.
Without this patch the order is different every run though, and that makes
comparing testresults unworkable.

Doesn't this patch make it always sort? And that should mean that -j1 will be the same as -JN again... ? it won't be the same order as before the patches... but I doubt that is important... not that I'm aware of anyway.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]