This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 09/11/2014 05:55 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:nvptx will be the first port to use BImode and have STORE_FLAG_VALUE==-1. That has exposed a bug in combine where we can end up calling num_sign_bit_copies for a BImode value. However, the return value is always 1 in that case, so it doesn't tell us anything and is going to be misinterpreted by the caller. Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux, together with the other patches. Ok?This should be handled in num_sign_bit_copies itself, i.e. handle BImode there.
What do you expect that function to do different? It returns the correct value.
Bernd
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |