This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check
- From: "VandeVondele Joost" <joost dot vandevondele at mat dot ethz dot ch>
- To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:45:12 +0000
- Subject: RE: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD93150F4103 at MBX23 dot d dot ethz dot ch> <20140905143740 dot GL17454 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD93150F414C at MBX23 dot d dot ethz dot ch> <20140905145304 dot GM17454 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD93150F7F45 at MBX23 dot d dot ethz dot ch> <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD93150F816B at MBX23 dot d dot ethz dot ch> <20140910132614 dot GF17454 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD93150F8688 at MBX23 dot d dot ethz dot ch>,<CAH6eHdQbx7tkc-8=1MfqyUxwwnTPXSZDjJfzupDJ2gEOeR52Zw at mail dot gmail dot com>
>> could it be that the pattern in normal1 should have been '[ab]*/ de*/ [ep]*/*' ?
>
>Yes, we are running these tests multiple times:
>
>PASS: 23_containers/map/modifiers/erase/abi_tag.cc (test for excess errors)
>PASS: 23_containers/multimap/modifiers/erase/abi_tag.cc (test for excess errors)
>PASS: 23_containers/multiset/modifiers/erase/abi_tag.cc (test for excess errors)
>PASS: 23_containers/set/modifiers/erase/abi_tag.cc (test for excess errors)
>PASS: 26_numerics/complex/abi_tag.cc (test for excess errors)
>
>I'll fix that.
Actually, the proper pattern should presumably be '[ab]*/* de*/* [ep]*/*' even though it seems to make no difference in testing. I'll have this included in yet another version of the parallel make check patch (plus some further reschuffling as requested by Jakub), so I think there is no need for you to fix this now.