This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH][AArch64 Testsuite] Add test of vld[234]q? intrinsic
- From: Christophe Lyon <christophe dot lyon at linaro dot org>
- To: Alan Lawrence <alan dot lawrence at arm dot com>
- Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:53:38 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH][AArch64 Testsuite] Add test of vld[234]q? intrinsic
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <540D8655 dot 9000307 at arm dot com> <CAFqB+PxNjwLL-o2PCWCY4i4Kek9udoGq7+E4mD9n=eX1pRs05A at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 9 September 2014 12:19, Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcroft@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8 September 2014 11:35, Alan Lawrence <alan.lawrence@arm.com> wrote:
>> This adds a test of all the variants of vld2, vld2q, vld3, vld3q, vld4, and
>> vld4q. These all use typexNxM structs and the OI/CI/XImode mechanism, so the
>> test cross-checks this against plain ol' vst1(q?).
>>
>> Cross-tested on aarch64-none-elf (passing), also on aarch64_be-none-elf
>> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59810).
>>
Hi Alan,
On my side, your new test fails at execution on aarch64_be-none-elf:
http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/build/cross-validation/gcc/trunk/215072/report-build-info.html
This seems strange since you tested it too.
I am using the Foundation Model.
Christophe.
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/vldN_1.c: New test.
>
> OK /Marcus