This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 10/09/14 15:38, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 10/09/14 15:41 +0800, Tony Wang wrote:-----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Wakely [mailto:jwakely@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 6:40 PM To: Tony Wang Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan; gcc-patches; libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [Patch ARM v2] Fix PR target/56846 On 09/09/14 17:47 +0800, Tony Wang wrote:Hi there, This is a updated patch to fix pr56846. Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and no regression for regression test on Linux and a cross regression test on arm-none-eabi. OK for the trunk? gcc/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: 2014-09-09 Tony Wang <tony.wang@arm.com> PR target/56846 * libsupc++/eh_personality.cc(PERSONALITY_FUNCTION):^ There should be a space after the file name (look at existing changelog entries) OK with that change.Committed with your comment on trunk, and also tested on 4.9 branch with no regression. So is it ok to back port to 4.9 branch?I'd at least like to see it working OK on trunk for a while without regressions, and I don't know the EABI code well enough to be confident it's safe to backport.
I am reasonably sure it's ok from my reading of the explanation and the code considered, and I'd also to some extent take Andrew's word for it since he's been involved in this space.
I'd like it to bake on trunk for a few days before we ask for this to be backported. It would give all autotesters that run for ARM a chance to catch up and make sure we aren't missing anything.
From my p.o.v. this is an RM decision. regards Ramana
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |