This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PR debug/60655, debug loc expressions
- From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana dot radhakrishnan at arm dot com>, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:27:35 +0100
- Subject: Re: PR debug/60655, debug loc expressions
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <alpine dot DEB dot 1 dot 10 dot 1409020249380 dot 2958 at tp dot orcam dot me dot uk> <CAGWvnyk61JeAUVBogq5uf5gDQzqkj+-VTuNag1FMb=h6ttNztg at mail dot gmail dot com> <20140903053117 dot GF17693 at bubble dot grove dot modra dot org> <20140904122150 dot GL17693 at bubble dot grove dot modra dot org> <alpine dot DEB dot 1 dot 10 dot 1409042020320 dot 27075 at tp dot orcam dot me dot uk> <20140905013004 dot GN17693 at bubble dot grove dot modra dot org> <20140909115027 dot GR17693 at bubble dot grove dot modra dot org> <alpine dot DEB dot 1 dot 10 dot 1409092255590 dot 27075 at tp dot orcam dot me dot uk> <20140910130922 dot GU17693 at bubble dot grove dot modra dot org>
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Alan Modra wrote:
> I always build powerpc64-linux with --enable-targets=powerpc-linux and
> regression test with RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=unix/'{-m32,-m64}',
> so my "bootstrapped and regression tested powerpc64-linux" claim
> includes a -m32 regression test too. Not quite as comprehensive a
> test as you've done (thanks!), but I did see the FAIL->PASS for -m32.
OK, good, I just wanted to be sure we're on the same page. Thanks!
Maciej