This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][ARM][1/7] Convert FP mnemonics to UAL | mov patterns


On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/09/14 09:40, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>
> Hi Christophe,
>
>>
>> On 9 September 2014 13:02, Ramana Radhakrishnan
>> <ramana.gcc@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> In this patch the move patterns are updated.
>>>> For the fconst case where the constant is encoded in a decimal
>>>> representation before going into the immediate field of the assembly
>>>> instruction UAL syntax allows for the real operand to be output directly
>>>> and leaves the assembler to do the encoding.
>>>> This simplifies the logic in arm_print_operand a bit.
>>>>
>>>> fp_immediate_constant is deleted and it seems that the function was not
>>>> meant to be used anyway (it returned "0" for all inputs!)
>>>>
>>>> Ok for trunk?
>>>
>>> Ok.
>>>
>>> Ramana
>>>
>> I've noticed that your patch makes
>> gcc.target/arm/memset-inline-5.c
>> fail when the compiler generates code for a57 + crypto-neon-fp-armv8.
>
>
> I've managed to reproduce the failure as well (don't forget the
> -mfloat-abi=hard), however
> I tried with and without my patch and could still see the failure. Looking
> at the test itself I don't
> see what my patch could have changed in this department...
>
> I'm cc'ing Bin since he added the test for his recent memset inlining work.
> Bin, could you have a look please?
I will have a look tomorrow.

Thanks,
bin
>
> Thanks,
> Kyrill
>
>> Passed now fails          [PASS => FAIL]:
>>    gcc.target/arm/memset-inline-5.c scan-assembler-not vstr
>>
>> You can have a look at:
>>
>> http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/build/cross-validation/gcc/trunk/215050/report-build-info.html
>> (search for the a57 lines)
>>
>> (The other lines marked as regressions can be ignored: they are caused
>> by your changes in the tests output, I not yet able to associate the
>> new pass with the new fail)
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Christophe.
>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Kyrill
>>>>
>>>> 2014-08-19  Kyrylo Tkachov  <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
>>>>
>>>>       * config/arm/arm.c (output_move_vfp): Use UAL syntax for
>>>> load/store
>>>>       multiple.
>>>>       (arm_print_operand): Don't convert real values to decimal
>>>>       representation in default case.
>>>>       (fp_immediate_constant): Delete.
>>>>       * config/arm/arm-protos.h (fp_immediate_constant): Likewise.
>>>>       * config/arm/vfp.md (*arm_movsi_vfp): Convert to VFP moves to UAL
>>>>       syntax.
>>>>       (*thumb2_movsi_vfp): Likewise.
>>>>       (*movdi_vfp): Likewise.
>>>>       (*movdi_vfp_cortexa8): Likewise.
>>>>       (*movhf_vfp_neon): Likewise.
>>>>       (*movhf_vfp): Likewise.
>>>>       (*movsf_vfp): Likewise.
>>>>       (*thumb2_movsf_vfp): Likewise.
>>>>       (*movdf_vfp): Likewise.
>>>>       (*thumb2_movdf_vfp): Likewise.
>>>>       (*movsfcc_vfp): Likewise.
>>>>       (*thumb2_movsfcc_vfp): Likewise.
>>>>       (*movdfcc_vfp): Likewise.
>>>>       (*thumb2_movdfcc_vfp): Likewise.
>>>>
>>>> 2014-08-19  Kyrylo Tkachov  <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
>>>>
>>>>       * gcc.target/arm/pr51835.c: Update expected assembly.
>>>>       * gcc.target/arm/vfp-1.c: Likewise.
>>>>       * gcc.target/arm/vfp-ldmdbd.c: Likewise.
>>>>       * gcc.target/arm/vfp-ldmdbs.c: Likewise.
>>>>       * gcc.target/arm/vfp-ldmiad.c: Likewise.
>>>>       * gcc.target/arm/vfp-ldmias.c: Likewise.
>>>>       * gcc.target/arm/vfp-stmdbd.c: Likewise.
>>>>       * gcc.target/arm/vfp-stmdbs.c: Likewise.
>>>>       * gcc.target/arm/vfp-stmiad.c: Likewise.
>>>>       * gcc.target/arm/vfp-stmias.c: Likewise.
>
>
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]