This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Don't run guality.exp tests with LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS.
- From: Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com>
- To: Richard Biener <rguenther at suse dot de>
- Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Cary Coutant <ccoutant at google dot com>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 22:04:35 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't run guality.exp tests with LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1404295545-17107-1-git-send-email-mjw at redhat dot com> <53B49076 dot 8050005 at redhat dot com> <20140703053713 dot GZ31640 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <b305ae42-a9e9-42ce-bd9b-d3e444bc3441 at email dot android dot com> <20140703075536 dot GB31640 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <30d70fa5-e04b-4526-8e32-fa01298baa24 at email dot android dot com> <20140703183814 dot GJ31640 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <0a86fabc-9388-4b11-89c6-fc09f6b4d9af at email dot android dot com>
On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 21:52 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On July 3, 2014 8:38:14 PM CEST, Jakub Jelinek <email@example.com> wrote:
> >On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 08:37:07PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> Well, simply removing the regression testing for LTO is a
> >maintainance nightmare as well.
> >> The guality testsuite is very noisy anyway with all the xfail and
> >Let's keep it as is then?
> That works for me.
I don't find that very satisfactory. I want to add more guality tests,
but the fact that they are unreliable and by default introduce even more
FAILs when lto is enabled makes that not very attractive. I do like
Jakub's suggestion to disable the guality tests be run with lto by
default, but provide an environment variable to enable them for those
that want to try them anyway. Shall I implement that?