This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[RFC] HOST_WIDE_INT transition steps


The following is my current idea on progressing on the HOST_WIDE_INT
removal

1) https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00381.html (ping)

2) make sure [u]int64_t is available and use that to define HOST_WIDE_INT

3) s/HOST_WIDE_INT/int64_t/ (same for unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT)

Leaves us with HOST_WIDEST_INT (just use [u]int64_t, I don't think
we care for 128bit types).  And HOST_WIDEST_FAST_INT for which
I don't have a very good suggestion other than either keeping
it, unconditionally using 'long' (thus simply remove
use_long_long_for_widest_fast_int and handling).  The fast_[u]int64_t
types and friends don't seem to be very "useful".

Any comments?

Thanks,
Richard.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]