This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi, On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 12:47:19, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote: >>> I think you are right, this flag is no longer necessary, and removing >>> this code path would simplify everything. Therefore I'd like to propose >>> to remove the "keep_aligning" parameter of get_inner_reference as >>> a split-out patch. >>> >>> Boot-strapped (with languages=all,ada,go) and >>> regression-tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. >> >> I don't understand how you can commit a patch that changes something only on >> strict-alignment platforms and test it only on x86-64. This change *must* be >> tested with Ada on a strict-alignment platform, that's the only combination >> for which it is exercised. If you cannot do that, then please back it out. >> >> More generally speaking, it's not acceptable to make cleanup changes like that >> in the RTL expander without extreme care, which of course starts with proper >> testing. The patch should not have been approved either for that reason. > > I'm fine with reverting it for now (you were in CC of the patch submission > but silent on it, I asked for the patch to start simplifying the way > mems are expanded - ultimately to avoid the recursion and mem-attribute > compute by the recursion). > > We can come back during stage1. > Well, it's stage1 again. I still have that already-approved patch, updated to current trunk. I've successfully boot-strapped it on armv7-linux-gnueabihf with all languages enabled, including Ada. The test suite runs cleanly without any drop-outs. Is it OK to commit now, or are there objections? Thanks Bernd. > get_object_alignment should be able to properly handle this case > if you call it on the full reference in the normal_inner_ref: case. > All the weird duplicate code on the VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR case > should IMHO go. > > Richard. > >> -- >> Eric Botcazou
Attachment:
changelog-inner-reference.txt
Description: Text document
Attachment:
patch-inner-reference.diff
Description: Binary data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |