This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Fix PR60644
- From: Alexander Ivchenko <aivchenk at gmail dot com>
- To: "Iyer, Balaji V" <balaji dot v dot iyer at intel dot com>
- Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 17:33:38 +0400
- Subject: Re: Fix PR60644
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CACysShhtg7wo-wOuCTJwihPcm_gZn4u876rmkUuKo-NxwNmg5Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <CACysShiwd9C5kYiptiEZO8stOcjM+HWb-EHMiZkoC1kR2JepcA at mail dot gmail dot com> <CACysShgkq1nWx1Gqg-tHVT06bcbGSUTu0WYAmZL4G0kjNo2dDw at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFiYyc049Tm3hGvhcLP2AS6pF2a4h3bXcMY3XTOeJMymyiGq7w at mail dot gmail dot com> <CACysShhgT3R0cEn0WkXoLQv-qn4HcMkxZfoctcLHEacQagDq6w at mail dot gmail dot com> <CACysShiDZ3yDoN47ccYcQgQP3Tzr_GvjEp54zjPASoZRFu0-rA at mail dot gmail dot com> <20140409120556 dot GJ1817 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A53F443 at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com> <20140409132849 dot GL1817 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A53F461 at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com>
The changes are consistent with what is currently in upstream. So
there is no additional work required
2014-04-09 17:31 GMT+04:00 Iyer, Balaji V <balaji.v.iyer@intel.com>:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:jakub@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2014 9:29 AM
>> To: Iyer, Balaji V
>> Cc: Alexander Ivchenko; Richard Biener; GCC Patches
>> Subject: Re: Fix PR60644
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 01:23:59PM +0000, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:jakub@redhat.com]
>> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2014 8:06 AM
>> > > To: Alexander Ivchenko
>> > > Cc: Richard Biener; GCC Patches; Iyer, Balaji V
>> > > Subject: Re: Fix PR60644
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:46:13PM +0400, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
>> > > > ping..
>> > >
>> > > I guess it really depends on whether the libcilkrts sources are
>> > > going to be (semi?)regularly imported from some upstream repository
>> > > or not, and if the upstream is willing to accept these changes.
>> > >
>> >
>> > Yes.
>>
>> So, are you ok with the changes and will you handle propagating them
>> upstream once they are committed to GCC?
>> If yes, the patch is preapproved.
>
> Yes, I am Ok with the changes. We will check the patch in soon that will fix this error.
>
>>
>> Jakub