This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFA: Testsuite PATCH to add support for dlopen tests
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>, Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 11:01:15 +0200
- Subject: Re: RFA: Testsuite PATCH to add support for dlopen tests
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <533EE397 dot 9010600 at redhat dot com>
Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> writes:
> richi asked for a testcase for 60731, and since we didn't already have
> support for tests using dlopen, I had to add it. Does this approach make
> sense?
ERROR: tcl error sourcing /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20140408/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/dg.exp.
ERROR: can't rename "dg-save-unknown": command doesn't exist
while executing
"rename dg-save-unknown unknown"
(procedure "saved-dg-test" line 96)
invoked from within
"saved-dg-test /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20140408/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/dso/dlclose1.C -std=c++98 { -pedantic-errors -Wno-long-long}"
("eval" body line 1)
invoked from within
"eval saved-dg-test $args "
(procedure "dg-test" line 11)
invoked from within
"dg-test $test $flags ${default-extra-flags}"
(procedure "g++-dg-runtest" line 27)
invoked from within
"g++-dg-runtest $tests $DEFAULT_CXXFLAGS"
(file "/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20140408/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/dg.exp" line 60)
invoked from within
"source /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20140408/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/dg.exp"
("uplevel" body line 1)
invoked from within
"uplevel #0 source /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20140408/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/dg.exp"
invoked from within
"catch "uplevel #0 source $test_file_name""
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."