This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [committed] Skip gcc.dg/torture/pr60092.c on 32-bit hpux

From: John David Anglin <dave dot anglin at bell dot net>
To: Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 10:02:47 -0400
Subject: Re: [committed] Skip gcc.dg/torture/pr60092.c on 32-bit hpux
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <BLU0-SMTP87780544A0C561E8250BFE977A0 at phx dot gbl> <yddbnwww0v8 dot fsf at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>

On 3/24/2014 2:45 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:

John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net> writes:

Index: gcc.dg/torture/pr60092.c
===================================================================
--- gcc.dg/torture/pr60092.c	(revision 208769)
+++ gcc.dg/torture/pr60092.c	(working copy)
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
  /* { dg-do run } */
  /* { dg-require-weak "" } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "No undefined weak" { hppa*-*-hpux* && { ! lp64 } } { "*" } { "" } } */

Please omit those default args to dg-skip-if.  Besides, it seems we
should have a separate undefined_weak (or whatever) keyword for this,
rather than listing targets explicitly.  But that's certainly not 4.9
material.

I agree. I'll see about removing the default arguments. There are abunch of tests

with the same dg-skip-if statement.

Dave

--
John David Anglin    dave.anglin@bell.net

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [committed] Skip gcc.dg/torture/pr60092.c on 32-bit hpux
  - From: Rainer Orth

References:
- [committed] Skip gcc.dg/torture/pr60092.c on 32-bit hpux
  - From: John David Anglin
- Re: [committed] Skip gcc.dg/torture/pr60092.c on 32-bit hpux
  - From: Rainer Orth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]