This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PING: Fwd: Re: [patch] implement Cilk Plus simd loops on trunk


Hi!

On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:44:45 -0700, Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com> wrote:
> I fixed a few nits Jason pointed out off-line, and both him and Jakub 
> have approved the patch for trunk.
> 
> In running the final round of tests I noticed a few problems with my 
> choice of bit numbers for the GF_OMP_* masks.  I fixed them, and re-ran 
> tests on x86-64 Linux.
> 
> Attached is the final version of the patch I have committed to trunk.

> Date:   Mon Oct 14 18:32:13 2013 -0500

> --- a/gcc/omp-low.c
> +++ b/gcc/omp-low.c

> @@ -3587,7 +3619,7 @@ lower_rec_input_clauses (tree clauses, gimple_seq *ilist, gimple_seq *dlist,
>        /* Don't add any barrier for #pragma omp simd or
>  	 #pragma omp distribute.  */
>        if (gimple_code (ctx->stmt) != GIMPLE_OMP_FOR
> -	  || gimple_omp_for_kind (ctx->stmt) == GF_OMP_FOR_KIND_FOR)
> +	  || gimple_omp_for_kind (ctx->stmt) & GF_OMP_FOR_KIND_FOR)
>  	gimple_seq_add_stmt (ilist, build_omp_barrier (NULL_TREE));
>      }

Maybe it's just too late on a Friday evening, but I don't understand this
change, part of r204863.  GF_OMP_FOR_KIND_FOR has the value zero;
shouldn't this comparison have remained unchanged?  Is the following
(untested) patch OK for trunk?  Does this need a test case?

commit f3c7834ecbedc50e04223d24b1b671fc8a62c169
Author: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
Date:   Fri Mar 7 21:11:43 2014 +0100

    Restore check for OpenMP for construct.
    
    	gcc/
    	* omp-low.c (lower_rec_input_clauses) <build_omp_barrier>: Restore
    	check for GF_OMP_FOR_KIND_FOR.

diff --git gcc/omp-low.c gcc/omp-low.c
index 4dc3956..713a4ae 100644
--- gcc/omp-low.c
+++ gcc/omp-low.c
@@ -3915,7 +3915,7 @@ lower_rec_input_clauses (tree clauses, gimple_seq *ilist, gimple_seq *dlist,
       /* Don't add any barrier for #pragma omp simd or
 	 #pragma omp distribute.  */
       if (gimple_code (ctx->stmt) != GIMPLE_OMP_FOR
-	  || gimple_omp_for_kind (ctx->stmt) & GF_OMP_FOR_KIND_FOR)
+	  || gimple_omp_for_kind (ctx->stmt) == GF_OMP_FOR_KIND_FOR)
 	gimple_seq_add_stmt (ilist, build_omp_barrier (NULL_TREE));
     }
 


GrÃÃe,
 Thomas

Attachment: pgpeYvp6eqpv_.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]