This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM TLS handling (PR target/58595)
- From: Christophe Lyon <christophe dot lyon at linaro dot org>
- To: Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramrad01 at arm dot com>
- Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Richard Earnshaw <richard dot earnshaw at arm dot com>, Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana dot radhakrishnan at arm dot com>, Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 20:56:55 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM TLS handling (PR target/58595)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20140305091239 dot GV22862 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <CAJA7tRYv7r0-8-dPNCrouuJ-3tSeXnknsoaZ_dH9v19OVQ8v4w at mail dot gmail dot com>
Hi,
It seems the new test fails at execution on aarch64-none-elf (and
aarch64_be-none-elf) using the ARM Foundation Model as simulator.
Sorry, I don't have access to more detail right now.
Christophe.
On 6 March 2014 06:44, Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.gcc@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> arm_legitimize_address may be called with a TLS symbol referenced, even when
>> x is not itself a SYMBOL_REF. Most often it is something like:
>> (const:SI (plus:SI (symbol_ref:SI "tlsvar") (const_int NNN)))
>> but generally it can be something else (e.g. from expansion of
>> TARGET_MEM_REF). Unfortunately this function legitimizes only the
>> SYMBOL_REF TLS case as TLS load, but the more complex forms with e.g. -fpic
>> can e.g. fall thru into legitimize_pic_address -> gen_calculate_pic_address,
>> which means either wrong-code or ICE later on.
>> Fixed by legitimizing both the SYMBOL_REF and
>> CONST+PLUS+SYMBOL_REF+CONST_INT case, and for more complex TLS containing
>> expressions just returning x (in that case the caller will split the PLUS
>> on its own).
>>
>> Kyrill has kindly bootstrapped/regtested this on Chromebook, ok for
>> trunk/4.8?
>>
>> 2014-03-05 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>> Meador Inge <meadori@codesourcery.com>
>>
>> PR target/58595
>> * config/arm/arm.c (arm_tls_symbol_p): Remove.
>> (arm_legitimize_address): Call legitimize_tls_address for any
>> arm_tls_referenced_p expression, handle constant addend. Call it
>> before testing for !TARGET_ARM.
>> (thumb_legitimize_address): Don't handle arm_tls_symbol_p here.
>>
>> * gcc.dg/tls/pr58595.c: New test.
>
>
> OK if no regressions. Please let any auto testers catch any issues and
> back port to 4.8 in about 48 hours.
>
> Regards,
> Ramana
>>
>> --- gcc/config/arm/arm.c.jj 2014-03-04 08:51:39.620081210 +0100
>> +++ gcc/config/arm/arm.c 2014-03-04 14:06:26.776277688 +0100
>> @@ -235,7 +235,6 @@ static tree arm_gimplify_va_arg_expr (tr
>> static void arm_option_override (void);
>> static unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT arm_shift_truncation_mask (enum machine_mode);
>> static bool arm_cannot_copy_insn_p (rtx);
>> -static bool arm_tls_symbol_p (rtx x);
>> static int arm_issue_rate (void);
>> static void arm_output_dwarf_dtprel (FILE *, int, rtx) ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED;
>> static bool arm_output_addr_const_extra (FILE *, rtx);
>> @@ -7336,6 +7335,32 @@ legitimize_tls_address (rtx x, rtx reg)
>> rtx
>> arm_legitimize_address (rtx x, rtx orig_x, enum machine_mode mode)
>> {
>> + if (arm_tls_referenced_p (x))
>> + {
>> + rtx addend = NULL;
>> +
>> + if (GET_CODE (x) == CONST && GET_CODE (XEXP (x, 0)) == PLUS)
>> + {
>> + addend = XEXP (XEXP (x, 0), 1);
>> + x = XEXP (XEXP (x, 0), 0);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (GET_CODE (x) != SYMBOL_REF)
>> + return x;
>> +
>> + gcc_assert (SYMBOL_REF_TLS_MODEL (x) != 0);
>> +
>> + x = legitimize_tls_address (x, NULL_RTX);
>> +
>> + if (addend)
>> + {
>> + x = gen_rtx_PLUS (SImode, x, addend);
>> + orig_x = x;
>> + }
>> + else
>> + return x;
>> + }
>> +
>> if (!TARGET_ARM)
>> {
>> /* TODO: legitimize_address for Thumb2. */
>> @@ -7344,9 +7369,6 @@ arm_legitimize_address (rtx x, rtx orig_
>> return thumb_legitimize_address (x, orig_x, mode);
>> }
>>
>> - if (arm_tls_symbol_p (x))
>> - return legitimize_tls_address (x, NULL_RTX);
>> -
>> if (GET_CODE (x) == PLUS)
>> {
>> rtx xop0 = XEXP (x, 0);
>> @@ -7459,9 +7481,6 @@ arm_legitimize_address (rtx x, rtx orig_
>> rtx
>> thumb_legitimize_address (rtx x, rtx orig_x, enum machine_mode mode)
>> {
>> - if (arm_tls_symbol_p (x))
>> - return legitimize_tls_address (x, NULL_RTX);
>> -
>> if (GET_CODE (x) == PLUS
>> && CONST_INT_P (XEXP (x, 1))
>> && (INTVAL (XEXP (x, 1)) >= 32 * GET_MODE_SIZE (mode)
>> @@ -7756,20 +7775,6 @@ thumb_legitimize_reload_address (rtx *x_
>>
>> /* Test for various thread-local symbols. */
>>
>> -/* Return TRUE if X is a thread-local symbol. */
>> -
>> -static bool
>> -arm_tls_symbol_p (rtx x)
>> -{
>> - if (! TARGET_HAVE_TLS)
>> - return false;
>> -
>> - if (GET_CODE (x) != SYMBOL_REF)
>> - return false;
>> -
>> - return SYMBOL_REF_TLS_MODEL (x) != 0;
>> -}
>> -
>> /* Helper for arm_tls_referenced_p. */
>>
>> static int
>> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr58595.c.jj 2014-03-04 12:56:48.337915114 +0100
>> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr58595.c 2014-03-04 12:56:48.337915114 +0100
>> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
>> +/* PR target/58595 */
>> +/* { dg-do run } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
>> +/* { dg-additional-options "-fpic" { target fpic } } */
>> +/* { dg-require-effective-target tls } */
>> +/* { dg-require-effective-target sync_int_long } */
>> +
>> +struct S { unsigned long a, b; };
>> +__thread struct S s;
>> +void bar (unsigned long *);
>> +
>> +__attribute__((noinline)) void
>> +foo (void)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> + for (i = 0; i < 10; i++)
>> + __sync_fetch_and_add (&s.b, 1L);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int
>> +main ()
>> +{
>> + s.b = 12;
>> + foo ();
>> + if (s.b != 22)
>> + __builtin_abort ();
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>>
>> Jakub