This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 12/13/2013 10:58 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
{ gimple stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (x); @@ -2162,7 +2162,7 @@ chain_of_csts_start (struct loop *loop, tree x) if (gimple_code (stmt) == GIMPLE_PHI) { if (bb == loop->header) - return stmt; + return stmt->as_a_gimple_phi ();return NULL;} @@ -2195,10 +2195,10 @@ chain_of_csts_start (struct loop *loop, tree x)If such phi node exists, it is returned, otherwise NULL is returned. */
I dislike separating the checking of gimple_code () and the following as_a. I rather envisioned this sort of thing as being more of an abstraction improvement if we never have to check gimple_code()... Then you are also less locked into a specific implementation.
So something more like: if (gimple_phi phi = stmt->dyncast_gimple_phi ()) { if (bb == loop->header) return phi; } IMO anyway... Andrew
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |