This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PING^2] [PATCH] PR59063
- From: Yury Gribov <y dot gribov at samsung dot com>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
- Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, eugeni dot stepanov at gmail dot com, VandeVondele Joost <joost dot vandevondele at mat dot ethz dot ch>, Evgeny Gavrin <e dot gavrin at samsung dot com>, Viacheslav Garbuzov <v dot garbuzov at samsung dot com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:13:56 +0400
- Subject: Re: [PING^2] [PATCH] PR59063
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <52831CF2 dot 1020203 at samsung dot com> <528C5453 dot 3020408 at samsung dot com> <529592F9 dot 3050209 at samsung dot com> <20131127071709 dot GV892 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <5295F91E dot 8090407 at samsung dot com> <20131128083045 dot GM892 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <52987367 dot 7000008 at samsung dot com> <878uw5riu6 dot fsf at igel dot home> <529C24B5 dot 5030407 at samsung dot com> <529D6595 dot 4090405 at redhat dot com>
> Is this still necessary after HJ's patch?
Frankly I don't have access to non-sanitizer-enabled platform but if I
manually disable it in libsanitizer/configure, I start getting Asan test
errors which are similiar to e.g.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-12/msg00189.html
(i386-unknown-freebsd10.0 from Dec 2). I hope Andreas can confirm
whether we still need this patch.
-Y
-----------------------------------------------
From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 9:01AM
To: Yury Gribov <y.gribov@samsung.com>, Andreas Schwab
<schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
eugeni.stepanov@gmail.com, VandeVondele Joost
<joost.vandevondele@mat.ethz.ch>, Evgeny Gavrin <e.gavrin@samsung.com>,
Viacheslav Garbuzov <v.garbuzov@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PING^2] [PATCH] PR59063
On 12/03/2013 09:01 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 12/01/13 23:12, Yury Gribov wrote:
> This is causing all the tests being run on all targets,
> even if libsanitizer is not supported,
> most of them failing due to link errors.
Thanks for the info and sorry about this. I should probably check
non-sanitized platforms as well before commiting patches. Does the
attached patch make sense to you? Worked for me on x64 and x64 with
manually disabled libsanitizer.
[ ... ]
Is this still necessary after HJ's patch?
jeff